<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complex Square Root</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4by12.com/blog/archives/119/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4by12.com/blog/archives/119</link>
	<description>by Guy Gur-Ari</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Gur Ari</title>
		<link>http://4by12.com/blog/archives/119/comment-page-1#comment-6001</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Gur Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4by12.com/blog/archives/119#comment-6001</guid>
		<description>Yes of course. Perhaps the post was not clear. My only point is this: With the reals, the mistake is easy to spot. More importantly, one can work with a definition (sqrt = positive root), using which algebra behaves as you expect.

With the complex numbers the mistake is more subtle, and there is no such convenient definition for sqrt. Seemingly innocent manipulations often conceal mistakes, as one must always be careful when crossing the branch cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes of course. Perhaps the post was not clear. My only point is this: With the reals, the mistake is easy to spot. More importantly, one can work with a definition (sqrt = positive root), using which algebra behaves as you expect.</p>
<p>With the complex numbers the mistake is more subtle, and there is no such convenient definition for sqrt. Seemingly innocent manipulations often conceal mistakes, as one must always be careful when crossing the branch cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jascha</title>
		<link>http://4by12.com/blog/archives/119/comment-page-1#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>jascha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4by12.com/blog/archives/119#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>uh-oh.  I think it might be spreading to the reals!  Proof that 1 = -1:

sqrt(1) = 1
sqrt(1) = -1

1 = sqrt(1)/sqrt(1) = 1/-1 = -1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh-oh.  I think it might be spreading to the reals!  Proof that 1 = -1:</p>
<p>sqrt(1) = 1<br />
sqrt(1) = -1</p>
<p>1 = sqrt(1)/sqrt(1) = 1/-1 = -1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
